A recent post to teachinghistory offers a four step process for teachers to use with middle school students in their analysis of primary documents. It offers an approach that highlights the more complex historical thinking skills found at the middle school level.
In the illustration provided, students analyze the texts of four speeches given by President Jackson around the time of the Indian Removal Act. Each text, along with its accompanying key questions, is included.
Read more...
There are also free posters for downloading - available here...
Sunday, September 23, 2012
Everything Hinges on Assessment - By Justin Reich
Here's an interesting blog entry, by Justin Reich, about Sam Wineberg's Beyond the Bubble project at Standford. As in Canada, assessment within historical thinking remains a substantial topic for discussion. How to move beyond marking students merely for their ability to recall surface narratives or facts about the past.
Read more here...
Read more here...
Labels:
assessment,
Historical Thinking,
standards,
teaching history
Wednesday, July 11, 2012
Rating System for Evaluating Public History Web Sites
By Debra DeRuyver, Jennifer Evans, James Melzer, and Emma Wilmer
(Written and Mounted April 30, 2000)
Regular visitors to public history Web sites include historians and non-historians; academic and non-academic publics. Oft times, Web sites are used as the sole source of historical information on particular topics, particularly by K-12 and undergraduate students. Therefore, critical analysis of these sites is of the utmost importance. We as public historians have a responsibility to critique and evaluate these online resources, both to help improve the specific sites under review and to raise the bar for the entire field of public history. Site analyses provide benefits to several different groups:
(Written and Mounted April 30, 2000)
Regular visitors to public history Web sites include historians and non-historians; academic and non-academic publics. Oft times, Web sites are used as the sole source of historical information on particular topics, particularly by K-12 and undergraduate students. Therefore, critical analysis of these sites is of the utmost importance. We as public historians have a responsibility to critique and evaluate these online resources, both to help improve the specific sites under review and to raise the bar for the entire field of public history. Site analyses provide benefits to several different groups:
- The user gains an idea of the strengths and weaknesses of a site and the validity and reliability of the information contained therein.
- The reviewed site benefits from a constructive outside appraisal.
- Un-reviewed public history sites benefit from having models of best practices and common pitfalls.
- Critical site analyses encourage better scholarship and more engaging presentations of public history.
- Ultimately, the historical record is served by site analyses; site reviews provide traces of presentations of public history on the Web during its first decade of existence.
Friday, May 18, 2012
Friday, May 11, 2012
Monday, May 7, 2012
A-08 Making Thinking Visible in History Education: May 4, 2012 – Middle School Subject Council, Fredericton - Cynthia Wallace-Casey (UNB)
by Cynthia Wallace-Casey,
PhD Candidate
University of New Brunswick (Fredericton)
Agenda for the day
PhD Candidate
University of New Brunswick (Fredericton)
Agenda for the day
Introduction – What is making thinking visible?
What is Thinking?
What is Understanding?
The Big Picture (Historic Space
Mapping)
What is Historical thinking?
The Little Picture (Heritage Fair
projects)
Historical inquiry – working with
sources
Memory cases
St
Croix – 1604
School
Culture – 1900
Governance
– J Leonard O’Brien – 1960
WWI –
1918
York
Street, Fredericton - 1882
Wrap-up – Tying it back to the history map
How did you organize your data? What stories are
told?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)